MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236057182 · doi:10.1109/trustcom.2015.466

CaptureMe: Attacking the User Credential in Mobile Banking Applications

2015· article· en· W4236057182 on OpenAlex
Mohamed El-Serngawy, Chamseddine Talhi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2015 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ISPA · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Malware Detection Techniques
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCredentialPasswordComputer scienceAndroid (operating system)Optical character recognitionComputer securityMobile deviceMobile bankingInternet privacyWorld Wide WebArtificial intelligenceImage (mathematics)Operating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, the wide use of smart devices (phones and tablets) encourage financial institution to consider mobile banking applications as a necessity service to their clients. In this paper, we propose a screenshot attack "CaptureMe" to investigate the security risks of the password visibility feature on Android platform with the mobile banking applications. In CaptureMe attack we used different known techniques to take screenshot images and we applied highly efficient Optical Character Recognition (OCR) analysis using tesseract-ocr engine to extract the user credential from the taken screenshot images. We also explore the possible protection mechanisms against CaptureMe with more than 130 mobile banking applications exist in Google play store.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it