MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236074034 · doi:10.1002/essoar.10506447.1

Alkalinity Constraints on Basalt Carbonation for Permanent CO2 Storage

2021· preprint· en· W4236074034 on OpenAlexaff
Calista Brown, Dapo Awolayo, Benjamin M. Tutolo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlkalinityCarbonationCarbonateBasaltCarbon sequestrationCarbon dioxideMineralization (soil science)GeochemistryPrecipitationChemistryMineralogyEnvironmental scienceGeologySoil scienceMeteorologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Basalt carbonation has gained traction as a key technology for avoiding the worst consequences of human-driven climate change. However, our understanding of this method’s promise is likely inflated by the specialized conditions used in many of the most well-known laboratory studies and demonstration projects. For technological, hydrogeologic, and energetic simplicity, many basalt CO2 storage projects will likely inject supercritical, not dissolved, CO2. Thus, fluids in these systems are likely to have low alkalinity and low pH, in contrast to many experimental and demonstration studies. Here, we present a series of geochemical models that explore the dependence of carbon mineralization efficiency on alkalinity and therefore pH at conditions relevant to these proposed operations. We modelled the interaction of basalt with CO2 enriched, seawater-derived aquifer fluid with varying initial alkalinities at 60°C using a custom thermodynamic database incorporating updated thermodynamic data for relevant primary and secondary minerals. The results reinforce the notion that alkalinity is an important driver for carbonate precipitation, ultimately because carbonate minerals are up to an order of magnitude more soluble at pH <5 than they are at pH >6. Alkalinity increases of 5 to 10% proportionally increase carbonate precipitation in the models. Our results thus demonstrate that the elevated alkalinity found in many of the most well-known basalt carbonation studies yield disproportionately high rates of carbon mineralization, which, in turn, frames basalt carbonation as an extremely rapid and exceptionally effective CO2 storage method. Although supercritical CO2 injection operations such as those we explore here are likely to achieve high fractions of CO2 mineralization over their lifetimes, this will likely take considerably longer and potentially be ultimately less effective, due to sluggish rates of CO2 dissolution and alkalinity generation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsFrench-language works237,207