Book Reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Morgan, David. Protestants and Pictures: Religion, Visual Culture, and the Age of American Mass Production, reviewed by Kelly J. Baker Davis, Walter T., Jr. Teresa Blythe, Gary Dreibelbis, Mark Scalese, Elizabeth Winans Winslea, Donald L. Ashburn, Kimberly Ayers, and Lonnie Voth. Watching What We Watch: Prime-Time Television Through the Lens of Faith., reviewed by Alan L. Chan Santino, Jack, ed.Halloween and Other Festivals of Death and Life, reviewed by Christopher Moreman Greeley, Andrew M. and Albert J. Bergesen. God in the Movies: A Sociological Investigation, reviewed by Christopher Garbowski Waldmeir, John C. Poetry, Prose and Art in the American Social Gospel Movement, 1880-1910, reviewed by Jennifer Rycenga Hangen, Tona J. Redeeming the Dial: Radio, Religion, and Popular Culture in America, reviewed by W. Terry Lindley deChant, Dell. The Sacred Santa: The Religious Dimensions of Consumer Culture, reviewed by Frank Ferreri
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".