MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236118538 · doi:10.1177/0008429816649507

Erratum

2016· erratum· fr· W4236118538 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses · 2016
Typeerratum
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Tourism and Spaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParagraphHumanitiesSentenceLinguisticsPhilosophyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Turcotte P-A (2016) Notes conclusives générales. Studies in Religion / Sciences Religieuses 45(1) : 77–78 (DOI: 10.1177/0008429815622753). In the above referenced article, the word ‘que’ was introduced erroneously into the ninth sentence of the final paragraph during the production process. The sentence should have appeared as: “Pour ce qui est de Berger, ces notes, indépendamment de leur longueur, se font aisément incisives, de la sorte discutent et relativisent les ouvrages d’un auteur en cheminement, avec ses avancées et ses révisions, ses cohérences d’ensemble et ses contradictions ponctuelles, ses lignes de fond et ses expressions circonstanciées.” SAGE apologizes to the author and readers for any inconvenience or embarrassment caused.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.023
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in Religion/Sciences ReligieusesSame topicReligious Tourism and SpacesFrench-language works237,207