Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Text representations is a key task for many natural language processing applications such as document classification, ranking, sentimental analysis and so on. The goal of it is to numerically represent the unstructured text documents so that they can be computed mathematically. Most of the existing methods leverage the power of deep learning to produce a representation of text. However, these models do not consider about the problem that text itself is usually semantically ambiguous and reflects limited information. Due to this reason, it is necessary to seek help from external knowledge base to better understand text.In this paper, we propose a novel framework named Text Concept Vector which leverages both the neural network and the knowledge base to produce a high quality representation of text. Formally, a raw text is primarily conceptualized and represented by a set of concepts through a large taxonomy knowledge base. After that, a neural network is used to transform the conceptualized text into a vector form which encodes both the semantic information and the concept information of the original text. We test our framework on both the sentence level task and the document level task. The experimental results illustrate the effectiveness of our work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it