MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236250645 · doi:10.25100/cdea.v37i70.11507

Issue 70 - Introduction of articles

2021· article· en· W4236250645 on OpenAlexaff
Emmanuel Raufflet

Bibliographic record

VenueCuadernos de Administración · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBusiness, Innovation, and Economy
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsValue (mathematics)Circular economyProduction (economics)Political scienceEconomyEconomicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 70th issue of the Journal Cuadernos de Administración in its 45th anniversary is a special issue on the Circular Economy. The guest editors called for and reviewed papers and made an initial manuscript selection, defined arbitrators and assigned them papers, reviewed the arbitrators’ first-round opinion, forwarding their comments to the referees, and reviewed second-round opinions, and forwarded their comments to the authors for a final version and selecting the articles to be published in this special issue. This rigorous process gave us the six papers that we shall introduce below, not without first thanking all the authors from different countries who sent us their manuscripts and thanking the international and Colombian referees who undertook the academic task of making the assessments. The first article is entitled” Value creation under circular economy practices in the production of viche,” and it is a review of scientific literature wherein the authors propose the concept of the circular economy for the agri-food sector in search for increased efficiency in the use of resources by companies with closed production cycles. The authors set out to find practices oriented to creating economic and environmental value for the production of viche in the Colombian Pacific. “Colombian public policy strategies: transition to a circular economy” is the title of this issue’s second paper, which seeks to identify Colombian public policy strategies in the process of transitioning to a circular economy. It is a documentary analysis-coupled descriptive research, which analyzed the Colombian entities linked to this type of public policies, and found, among other things, the need for further articulation in their implementation for better effectiveness in different dimensions. The third paper hereof is “Circular economy business model: COANIQUEM solidarity store case,” wherein the authors start from a concern about waste and cooperation to achieve sustainable development and intend to understand stakeholders’ social behavior in a solidarity shop. This is an exploratory case study under qualitative methods in the Chilean COANIQUEM solidarity store. Its contribution is to become a study of circular economy strategies at the level of non-governmental organizations. “The Circular Economy of PET bottles in Colombia” is the title of the fourth article in this issue. Therein, the authors propose a characterization of the Circular Economy strategy for PET (Polyethylene Terephthalate) bottles in Colombia. The work is carried out under a descriptive methodology coupled with content analysis and in-depth interviews. The fifth article to this issue is entitled “Conceptual contributions of the social and solidarity economy to the Circular Economy.” Its author makes a reflection based on an analytical perspective and a review of the foundations of the Social and Solidarity Economy (“SSE”) with the Circular Economy (“CE”), finding some complementary aspects. Finally, the “Circular economy and reduction of consumption from the decolonial approach” is the last paper in this issue, wherein the authors reflect from the decolonial perspective, proposing an alternative to the circular economy. The authors made a conceptual review of articles published between 1990 and 2020 for a methodology and present the co-occurrence relationships and the visualization of semantic communities. The content of each article is its authors’ responsibility; our purpose at Cuadernos de Administración is to disseminate these research results or authors’ reflections after a rigorous assessment process. We hope that the articles published in the special Circular Economy issue serve our readers’ academic works and research processes in a field of knowledge that, as can be seen, is in the builds and of particular interest nowadays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.561
Threshold uncertainty score0.800

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0070.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0180.007
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4390.326

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCuadernos de AdministraciónSame topicBusiness, Innovation, and EconomyFrench-language works237,207