Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2014), "List of Contributors", Symbolic Interaction and New Social Media (Studies in Symbolic Interaction, Vol. 43), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, p. ix. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0163-239620140000043007 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2014 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Shing-Ling S. Chen University of Northern Iowa, USA Jeffrey Coons University of Northern Iowa, USA Judy Eaton Wilfrid Laurier University, Canada Mark D. Johns Luther College, USA Michael A. Katovich Texas Christian University, USA David Kirschner Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Jennifer A. A. Lavoie Wilfrid Laurier University, Canada Lara Lengel Bowling Green State University, USA Simon Lindgren Umeå University, Sweden Annette N. Markham Aarhus University, Denmark and Loyola University, USA Justin A. Martin Southern Illinois University Carbondale, USA Victoria Ann Newsom Olympic College, USA Carrie B. Sanders Wilfrid Laurier University, Canada Avi Shoshana University of Haifa, Israel Matthew Smith Wilfrid Laurier University, Canada Zahirah Suhaimi-Broder Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Laura A. Terlip University of Northern Iowa, USA J. Patrick Williams Nanyang Technological University, Singapore Book Chapters Symbolic Interaction and New Social Media Studies in Symbolic Interaction Symbolic Interaction and New Social Media Copyright Page Dedication List of Contributors When McLuhan Met Simmel: Form is the Content, Medium is the Message From Object to Flow: Network Sensibility, Symbolic Interactionism, and Social Media Social Network Analysis for Facebook: Locating Cliques and Visualizing Sociability New Iowa School Redux: Second Life as Laboratory Mutable Selves and Digital Reflexivities: Social Media for Social Change in the Middle East and North Africa Structural Roles in Massively Multiplayer Online Games: A Case Study of Guild and Raid Leaders in World of Warcraft (Re)Embodiment of the Digital Self and First Life Body in a New Social Media Environment: Paid Sex Work in Second Life Surfing to an Alternative Self: Internet Technology and Sexuality among “Married Straight Homosexual Men” “The Wall is the City”: A Narrative Analysis of Vancouver’s Post-Riot “Apology Wall” Author Biographies
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.724 | 0.731 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".