Critical Entrepreneurship ABC Primer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette rubrique, paraissant à chaque numéro, vise à suggérer une entrée dans les approches critiques en entrepreneuriat, qui évoluent dans la communauté entre méconnaissance et scepticisme, par le biais d'une interrogation ou d'une refondation du vocabulaire.Dans la tradition de l'abécédaire de Gilles Deleuze, il ne s'agit donc pas de proposer à proprement parler un dictionnaire objectivant les termes employés mais bien plus de porter un regard critique sur le discours entrepreneurial.Les auteurs et autrices sont aussi en mesure de développer une perspective originale et subjective des entrées traitées.Ainsi trois types d'entrées sont proposées dans cet abécédaire en tentant de trouver un équilibre entre les types :-Perspective critique du vocabulaire traditionnel ; -Développement d'un vocabulaire critique en entrepreneuriat ; -Pratique entrepreneuriale et critique : des mots ordinaires reflétant une autre pratique entrepreneuriale à l'œuvre.Académie de l'Entrepreneuriat et de l'Innovation | Téléchargé le 05/08/2026 sur https://shs.cairn.info(IP: 185.34.43.108)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".