MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236290647 · doi:10.1002/mmce.20276

Automated time domain modeling of linear and nonlinear microwave circuits using recurrent neural networks

2008· article· en· W4236290647 on OpenAlexaff
Hitaish Sharma, Qi‐Jun Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTime domainComputer scienceWaveformTransient (computer programming)Recurrent neural networkFrequency domainNonlinear systemEnvelope (radar)Artificial neural networkElectronic engineeringAmplifierMicrowaveComputational electromagneticsAlgorithmControl theory (sociology)Artificial intelligenceEngineeringTelecommunicationsPhysicsBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, a recurrent neural network (RNN) method is employed for dynamic time-domain modeling of both linear and nonlinear microwave circuits. An automated RNN modeling technique is proposed to efficiently determine the training waveform distribution and internal RNN structure during the offline training process. This technique extends a recent automatic model generation (AMG) algorithm from frequency-domain model generation to dynamic time-domain model generation. Two types of applications of the algorithm are presented, transient electromagnetic (EM) behavior modeling of microwave structures, and time-domain envelope modeling of power amplifiers (PA). For transient EM modeling, we consider EM structures with varying material and geometrical parameters. AMG automatically varies the EM structural parameters during training and drives time-domain EM simulators to generate necessary amount of data for RNN to learn. AMG aims to model the transient behavior with minimum RNN order while satisfying accuracy requirements. In modeling PA behavior, an envelope formulation is used to specifically learn the AM/AM and AM/PM distortions due to third-generation (3G) digital modulation input. The RNN PA model is able to model these time domain distortions after training and can accurately model the amplifier behavior in both time (AM/AM, AM/PM) and frequency (spectral re-growth). © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J RF and Microwave CAE, 2008.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided EngineeringSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207