MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236296623 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316530115.015

News… and Views?

2013· book-chapter· en· W4236296623 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C. D. Poster

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Leadership and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYesterdayQuarter (Canadian coin)Order (exchange)HistoryBusinessPhysicsArchaeologyAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RECORDER REGRETS PASSING OF BIRCH BOY'S APPEAL FAILS The Recorder of Y told the father of a boy of 14 at Y Quarter Sessions yesterday: ‘ If I could order your boy to be birched I would. But unfortunately I can't.’ He dismissed the boy's appeal against committal to an approved school for receiving stolen cigarettes. Told that the boy had previously been warned at the age of 12 for receiving cigarettes at school, the Recorder asked the boy's father: ‘What did you do to knock the nonsense out of him when he brought these cigarettes home?’ The father: ‘I didn't hit him.’ The Recorder: ‘Why not? You are his father and you did nothing about it. How did you punish the boy?’— ‘By stopping his pocket money.’ ’ Were you brought up by a father who was strict?’—‘I wasn't hit, sir.’ ’ I was and I haven't been convicted for these offences,’ the Recorder retorted. In the old days he could have given the boy half a dozen with the birch, he added. That power had now been taken away from him. ‘ If I had it, I would use it, and he would be a much better boy too.’ This item of news appeared in a newspaper a few years ago, but it might well have appeared in yesterday's paper. It tells of a common enough incident: a young lad in trouble. It would scarcely be interesting to us if the report went no further than the first six lines. We learn these facts: a boy of fourteen had appealed to the Quarter Sessions against a decision [by the Magistrates of the Juvenile Court] to send him to an approved school for receiving stolen cigarettes. This was his second appearance in Court for such an offence. The Recorder upheld the Magistrates' decision. It was not within the Recorder's power to order a birching. These are facts: but if you look at the Recorder's actual first statement as quoted in the newspaper you will see that it contains something more than fact. It contains the Recorder's opinion, his views on the value of corporal punishment in correcting juvenile crime. One word in particular indicates that in his opinion the law he has to administer is wrong.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.483

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1440.078

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicEducational Leadership and PracticesFrench-language works237,207