MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236317477 · doi:10.1049/oap-cired.2021.0187

Flexibility platform for community energy systems

2020· article· en· W4236317477 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCIRED - Open Access Proceedings Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Power System Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlexibility (engineering)ExploitSustainabilityRenewable energyComputer scienceEnvironmental economicsRisk analysis (engineering)BusinessComputer securityEngineeringEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integrating technological changes and sustainability considerations poses multidisciplinary challenges for the power system beyond economic and environmental benefits. Allowing energy from distributed energy resources to be traded and coordinated peer-to-peer in real-time can mitigate system and policy-making issues while decreasing the strain on power system infrastructure. Transactive Renewable Energy Exchange (TREX) is artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted flexibility platform for community energy systems that can also act as an AI training tool. Using AI agents to manage instantaneous market interactions in real-time is the first step to long-term sustainability and flexibility. In this article, the authors show that deep learning agents are able to learn to exploit the trading habits of opposing expert-designed traders in a TREX environment. Based on the results, future efforts will be extended towards a multi-agent setup with full utilisation of the capabilities of the market.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.759
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it