MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236357795 · doi:10.21236/ada410495

Methyl Tin(IV) Derivatives of HOTeF5 and HN(SO2CF3)2: A Solution Multi-NMR Study and X-ray Crystal Structures of (CH3)2SnC1(OTeF5) and (CH3)3Sn(H2O)2N(SO2CF3)2

2003· report· en· W4236357795 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ashwani Vij, William W. Wilson, Vandana Vij, Robert C. Corley, Fook S. Tham

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Compounds Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsTinCrystallographyChemistryMaterials scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Public reporting burden for tliis collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including ttie time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathenng and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information.Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Sen/ices, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collectiori of information if it does not display a currently valid 0MB control number.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOrganometallic Compounds Synthesis and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207