Art (du nu) et mobilisations citoyennes. Les performances de Spencer Tunick
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sollicité à deux reprises par Greenpeace, l’artiste Spencer Tunick a photographié des volontaires nus sur le glacier d’Aletsch en Suisse et dans le vignoble des Rontets en France. À partir des images prises in situ , des récits des bénévoles et des campagnes de communication de l’ONG, cet article interroge la contribution de ces rassemblements humains au débat public sur les questions environnementales. Une analyse de la rhétorique esthétique des corps dénudés comme incarnation de la vulnérabilité montre d’une part comment l’engagement physique et psychologique des participants joue un rôle primordial dans ces installations artistiques et militantes. D’autre part, ces performances s’inscrivent dans le savoir-faire communicationnel de Greenpeace où l’image est utilisée comme preuve des méfaits environnementaux et moyen d’interpellation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".