On the Fatigue and Fracture of Bladed and Integrally Bladed Rotors of Aircraft Engine Compressors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fatigue and fracture for bladed and integrally bladed rotors (IBR) of aircraft engine compressors has been studied. For IBRs, a new distinct finite element technique was developed to model crack propagation under combined low cycle and high cycle fatigue loading. The crack trajectory, aspect ratio, and shape resulting from the method agreed very well with airfoils which fractured in service. The technique can be extended on other compressor disk applications. For bladed rotors limited by fretting fatigue, a unique fracture mechanics based methodology was developed for obtaining an evolved coefficient of friction (COF) resulting from fretting motion between the fan blade and hub. The predicted nucleation location, nucleation life, crack trajectory, shape and propagation life agreed well with the fractured components. The study confirms that the fretting-specific modified Smith-Watson-Topper (SWT) parameter more accurately predicts the nucleation location and life of the crack compared to the plain fatigue SWT parameter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".