MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236473439 · doi:10.4000/laboreal.5125

Introdução ao dossiê temático “A análise ergonómica do trabalho e da formação para um desenvolvimento sustentável”

2014· article· pt· W4236473439 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLaboreal · 2014
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Sustainability and Education
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No quadro do 18º congresso da Associação Internacional de Ergonomia (2012, Recife, Brasil), o simpósio “ Ergonomics analysis of work and training (EAWT) » juntou investigadores e participantes de diversos países (Bélgica, Brasil, Canadá, França, Portugal, Suíça). Este simpósio inscreveu-se na continuidade de outros simpósios EAWT que ocorrem desde 1991, sobre os contributos da análise ergonómica para as situações de formação e de aprendizagem. Esta contribuição da ergonomia foi construída com...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.219
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it