Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mabuya frenata (Cope's mabuya) is a widely distributed species in South America, occurring in Argentina, Paraguay, Bolivia and Brazil (Gallardo 1968;Cei 1993).In Brazil, it is fairly widespread (Figure 1), having been registered from Tocantins and southern Pará (Pinto and Araujo 2000; Vrcibradic and Moura-Leite 2003) to Rio Grande do Sul (Lema 1994).However, M. frenata has never been previously recorded in Rio de Janeiro (Rocha et al. 2004).On 12 April 2005 we captured three specimens of M. frenata (two females: 77.4 and 83.6 mm SVL, respectively; a male: 62.0 mm SVL) at the Santuário Ecológico da Serra da Concórdia (22º22'18" S 43º47'23" W; 600m a.s.l), in Valença Municipality, Rio de Janeiro State (collection permit: 055/2005 -RAN/IBAMA).All specimens were captured during the morning, at an open and anthropically disturbed site, at the border of a forest fragment.The lizards were moving and basking on a rock wall.The specimens were deposited at the reptile collection of the Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro (MNRJ 13377-9).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.093 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".