Environmental Effects on the Operation of Triple-Junction Flexible Photovoltaic Panels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis contains a complete description of a solar photovoltaic experiment to monitor and predict the performance of solar technology in the temperate climate in Ontario. An experiment was designed and built to monitor weather data and determine the operating characteristics of the modules using high-resolution equipment. The data gathered were used in i the one-diode model to predict the power produced by the modules. A large sample of data was not achievable due to the experiment taking place during the winter where snow and a low solar angle heavily reduced the module performance. Results were nevertheless obtained for a Uni-Solar PVL-144 thin-film triple junction amorphous silicon module, and the power predicted was within 25% of what was measured. The module efficiency was found to be 7% -8% and the ideal tilt angle for Ottawa to be 50 10 . The findings presented in this thesis form a basis for future work in characterizing other types of solar modules in the Ontario climate, as well as furthering research in snow accumulation effects on photovoltaic systems. Most importantly, I am grateful for my thesis supervisor, Dr. Steven McGarry, for his dedicated efforts in keeping me motivated and pushing me to finish this work. I am
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".