Reviewer Acknowledgements for Journal of Mathematics Research, Vol. 11, No. 6
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Journal of Mathematics Research wishes to acknowledge the following individuals for their assistance with peer review of manuscripts for this issue. Their help and contributions in maintaining the quality of the journal is greatly appreciated. Many authors, regardless of whether Journal of Mathematics Research publishes their work, appreciate the helpful feedback provided by the reviewers. Reviewers for Volume 11, Number 6   Abimbola Abolarinwa, Landmark University, Nigeria Cibele Cristina Trinca Watanabe, Federal University of Tocantins (UFT), Brazil Denis Khleborodov, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia Francisco Bulnes, Research Department in Mathematics and Engineering, TESCHA, Mexico Gabriela Ciuperca, University Lyon 1, France Gane Sam Lo, Universite Gaston Berger de Saint-Louis, Senegal Gener Santiago Subia, Wesleyan University, Philippines Jalal Hatem, Baghdad University, Iraq Maria Alessandra Ragusa, University of Catania, Italy Martin Anokye, University of Cape Coast, Ghana Mashadi Ali, Riau University, Indonesia Meltem Erden Ege, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Turkey Mohammad A. AlQudah, German Jordanian University, Jordan Mohammad Sajid, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia Mustapha El Moudden, Moulay Ismail University, Morocco Omur Deveci, Kafkas University, Turkey Özen ÖZER, Kirklareli University, Turkey Philip Yordanoff Philipoff, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria Rami Ahmad El-Nabulsi, Athens Institute for Education and Research, Greece Rosalio G. Artes, Jr., Mindanao State University, Philippines Sanjib Kumar Datta, University of Kalyani, India Sergiy Koshkin, University of Houston Downtown, USA Vishnu Narayan Mishra, Indira Gandhi National Tribal University, India Xinyun Zhu, University of Texas of the Permian Basin, USA   Sophia Wang On behalf of, The Editorial Board of Journal of Mathematics Research Canadian Center of Science and Education
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.048 | 0.162 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it