MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236502875 · doi:10.1002/9781118970843.ch197

Depression

2020· other· en· W4236502875 on OpenAlexaff
Katerina Rnic, David J. A. Dozois

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences · 2020
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTreatment of Major Depression
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeurostimulationPsychologyMajor depressive disorderClinical psychologyDepression (economics)Electroconvulsive therapyCognitive behavioral therapyCognitionPsychiatryBehavioral activationPsychological interventionPsychosocialPsychotherapistInterpersonal psychotherapyMedicineNeuroscienceRandomized controlled trialInternal medicineStimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Major depressive disorder and dysthymia (or persistent depressive disorder) are debilitating disorders that are common, chronic, and often comorbid with other mental disorders and health problems. As a result, the depressive disorders are associated with significant personal, economic, and social cost. Depression is characterized, and in many cases, caused, by negative cognitive styles, interpersonal dysfunction and deficits, sensitivity to life stress, maladaptive personality traits, and biological dysfunction at the genetic, neurochemical, and neurophysiological levels of analysis. Effective interventions include first-line treatments such as antidepressant medication and psychotherapy (e.g. cognitive behavioral therapy, behavioral activation, interpersonal therapy, mindfulness based cognitive therapy) and, for treatment-resistant depression, neurostimulation treatments (e.g. electroconvulsive therapy, deep brain stimulation). Future research is needed to further integrate etiological models of depression to optimally inform treatment and to better understand and prevent relapse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1590.084

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual DifferencesSame topicTreatment of Major DepressionFrench-language works237,207