MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236527297 · doi:10.37128/2707-5826-2020-1-10

STUDY OF SOURCE MATERIAL FOR EDAPHIC SELECTION OF ALFALFA

2020· article· en· W4236527297 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vasyl Mamaliha, Vasyl Buhayov, Vitalii Horenskyi

Bibliographic record

VenueAgriculture and Forestry · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Biological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDry matterEdaphicCropDry weightAgronomyYield (engineering)Dry landMathematicsHorticultureBiologyEnvironmental scienceSoil waterEcologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study of collectible samples of alfalfa of different ecological and geographical origin on the harvest of dry matter and seeds against the background of increased acidity of soil solution (pH 5.20-5.53) made it possible to highlight the promising beyond these indicators samples that can be used in further breeding work. Comparison of the height of alfalfa plants in the first slope and feed productivity in general for 2019 shows that there is no direct correlation between these values. For example, the Galaxie variety, which was itself visopory and exceeded the standard by 12cm, was only in fourth place for the dry crop, and the Olga and Media varieties, which exceeded the standard by 9cm, were only eighth and seventh in the dry material. However, for the selection of varieties that combine these two traits, donors may be samples that behind the harvest of dry matter and the height of plants for three years of research reliably exceeded the standard: Banat, Vavilovka (Rodnichok), Feraks 58, Galaxie and Ferax 28. Not all samples form the maximum of green mass in the first slope, so there is no definite pattern between the height of plants in the first slope and the collection of dry matter for the entire growing season. The highest yield of dry matter on average for three years of research was obtained from varieties Vavilovka (Rodnichok) (Ukraine) (1.42 kg/m2), Banat (Serbia) (1.36 kg/m2) and Posevnaya 3022 (Uzbekistan) (1.22 kg/m2) at the harvest of the Sinyuha-standard grade 1.08 kg/m2. The best in seed productivity were samples of Jidrune (Lithuania) (31.9 g/m2), Feraks 58 (Canada) (29.9 g/m2), Tibet (Kazakhstan) (28.5 g/m2), Radoslawa (Ukraine) (28.2 g/m2), Kishvardi 27 (Hung.) (27.7 g/m2), Olga (26.5 g/m2) and Vavilovka (Rodnichok) (Ukraine) (26.2 g/m2) with a yield of standart of 23.5 g/m2. Particular attention is paid to the variety Ferax 58 (Canada), which for all the years of research reliably exceeded the standard for seed harvest and was at the level of the standard or exceeded it in the yield of dry matter. Further breeding work will use samples that reliably exceeded the standard for the average of three years of research for the collection of dry matter and the seed crop respectively: Ferax 58 (10% and 27%), Radoslawa (7% and 20%), Olga (11% and 13%), In addition, these samples exceeded the standard for plant sisoin in the first slope in 2019 by 31%, 11%, 8% and 55%, respectively. Key words: alfalfa sowing, selection, sample, variety, dry matter crop, seed harvest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.751
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgriculture and ForestrySame topicAgriculture and Biological StudiesFrench-language works237,207