En attendant Le Peletier de Saint-Fargeau : la règle pénale au début de la Révolution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Roberto Maktucci, Awaiting Le Peletier de Saint-Fargeau : Penal Provisions in the Early Days of the Revolution. The Saint-Fargeau Penal Code was the result of a long reform process aimed at counteracting a hypothetical code which would have imposed the death penalty on undefined deviant conduct charged as high treason. The protagonists of this strategy of constitutional codification were the jurist-deputies (Beaumetz, Du Port, Le Peletier de Saint-Fargeau) who were selected to serve on the Criminal Jurisprudence Committee of the National Assembly. The normative product of their efforts was, above all, votes on Articles VII, VIII and IX of the Dec laration of Rights, constitutionally guaranteeing the principle of strict equality. This was followed by the decree of 8 & 9 October 1789 which introduced rite mixte. Moreover, after the adoption of the right to a jury in a criminal trial (Spring 1790), the Committee took it as a matter of urgency to vote a law establishing proceedures in jury trials and a penal code which laid out a system of fixed penalties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".