MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236550653 · doi:10.1126/science.abd9834

Erratum for the Report “Global distribution of earthworm diversity” by H. R. P. Phillips, C. A. Guerra, M. L. C. Bartz, M. J. I. Briones, G. Brown, T. W. Crowther, O. Ferlian, K. B. Gongalsky, J. van den Hoogen, J. Krebs, A. Orgiazzi, D. Routh, B. Schwarz, E. M. Bach, J. Bennett, U. Brose, T. Decaëns, B. König-Ries, M. Loreau, J. Mathieu, C. Mulder, W. H. van der Putten, K. S. Ramirez, M. C. Rillig, D. Russell, M. Rutgers, M. P. Thakur, F. T. de Vries, D. H. Wall, D. A. Wardle, M. Arai, F. O. Ayuke, G. H. Baker, R. Beauséjour, J. C. Bedano, K. Birkhofer, E. Blanchart, B. Blossey, T. Bolger, R. L. Bradley, M. A. Callaham, Y. Capowiez, M. E. Caulfield, A. Choi, F. V. Crotty, A. Dávalos, D. J. Diaz Cosin, A. Dominguez, A. E. Duhour, N. van Eekeren, C. Emmerling, L. B. Falco, R. Fernández, S. J. Fonte, C. Fragoso, A. L. C. Franco, M. Fugère, A. T. Fusilero, S. Gholami, M. J. Gundale, M. Gutiérrez López, D. K. Hackenberger, L. M. Hernández, T. Hishi, A. R. Holdsworth, M. Holmstrup, K. N. Hopfensperger, E. Huerta Lwanga, V. Huhta, T. T. Hurisso, B. V. Iannone III, M. Iordache, M. Joschko, N. Kaneko, R. Kanianska, A. M. Keith, C. A. Kelly, M. L. Kernecker, J. Klaminder, A. W. Koné, Y. Kooch, S. T. Kukkonen, H. Lalthanzara, D. R. Lammel, I. M. Lebedev, Y. Li, J. B. Jesus Lidon, N. K. Lincoln, S. R. Loss, R. Marichal, R. Matula, J. H. Moos, G. Moreno, A. Morón-Ríos, B. Muys, J. Neirynck, L. Norgrove, M. Novo, V. Nuutinen, V. Nuzzo, M. Rahman P, J. Pansu, S. Paudel, G. Pérès, L. Pérez-Camacho, R. Piñeiro, J.-F. Ponge, M. I. Rashid, S. Rebollo, J. Rodeiro-Iglesias, M. Á. Rodríguez, A. M. Roth, G. X. Rousseau, A. Rozen, E. Sayad, L. van Schaik, B. C. Scharenbroch, M. Schirrmann, O. Schmidt, B. Schröder, J. Seeber, M. P. Shashkov, J. Singh, S. M. Smith, M. Steinwandter, J. A. Talavera, D. Trigo, J. Tsukamoto, A. W. de Valença, S. J. Vanek, I. Virto, A. A. Wackett, M. W. Warren, N. H. Wehr, J. K. Whalen, M. B. Wironen, V. Wolters, I. V. Zenkova, W. Zhang, E. K. Cameron, N. Eisenhauer

2020· erratum· war· W4236550653 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScience · 2020
Typeerratum
Languagewar
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInvertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFondo para la Investigación Científica y TecnológicaWageningen University and ResearchStrategic Environmental Research and Development ProgramU.S. NavyLandwirtschaftliche RentenbankUniversität InnsbruckHigher Education Commision, PakistanUniversity of TorontoNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasOklahoma Agricultural Experiment StationFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchAgence Nationale de la RechercheScience and Engineering Research BoardScience Foundation IrelandInternational Atomic Energy AgencyU.S. Department of DefenseAmerican Association for the Advancement of ScienceEuropean CommissionEuropean Agricultural Fund for Rural DevelopmentTarbiat Modares UniversityAustrian Science FundRoyal Canadian Geographical SocietyUniversity of Hawai'i at MānoaUniversity of Hawai'iDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftDeutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-LeipzigFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do MaranhãoUniversidad Complutense de MadridInstituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y AlimentariaUniversidad Nacional de LujánAgentúra na Podporu Výskumu a VývojaGrains Research and Development Corporation
KeywordsDiversity (politics)EarthwormBiologyEcologySociologyAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After publication of the Report “Global distribution of earthworm diversity,” the authors discovered a bug in their data-preparation code. This bug affected only some datasets, but it removed from certain datasets all sites where no earthworms were recorded (“zero-sites”). Unaffected datasets still retained zeros. This bug affected all analyses in the report, generally causing the models to overestimate earthworm richness, abundance, and biomass, which was reflected in the predicted overall means decreasing in the revised analyses. After reanalysis, there were also changes in the inferred geographic patterns, but only minor effects on significant environmental drivers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1260.097

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScienceSame topicInvertebrate Taxonomy and EcologyFrench-language works237,207