MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236562153 · doi:10.18178/wcse.2017.06.216

Base Station Sleeping Mechanism for Reduced Delay Using Traffic Load Prediction

2017· article· en· W4236562153 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Alnoman, Alagan Anpalagan

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of 2017 the 7th International Workshop on Computer Science and Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBase stationMechanism (biology)Real-time computingComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Small cells are expected to be densely deployed in future networks to improve spectral and energy efficiencies.Due to the their small coverage and fluctuating number of users, the On-Off mechanism in small cell base stations (SBSs) has to be dynamically adapted in order to reduce the total energy consumption.However, the time delay associated with the transition from the Off to ON states can degrade the network performance.In this paper, a traffic prediction algorithm is proposed to perform a proactive SBS activation by anticipating future workload in SBS clusters using information of distance and received signal power of associated users.The distance and power measurements are smoothed using Haar wavelet filters to get a better approximation of the cluster's traffic load.Each SBS operates in a self-organized manner in coordination with the neighbouring SBSs in that cluster wherein the information of associated users are exchanged among SBSs.The work aims to adaptively modify the On-Off mechanism while minimizing the time delay that is incurred from the wake-up process of SBSs.Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm can significantly reduce the delay with a slight increase in power consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of 2017 the 7th International Workshop on Computer Science and EngineeringSame topicTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207