MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236578343 · doi:10.20431/2347-3134.0507011

The Protagonists Break the Tyranny of Silence- A Comparative Study on Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale and Shashi Deshpande’s That Long Silence

2017· article· en· W4236578343 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shashi Deshpande's That, Long Silence, S Sarkunam, Sheila Royappa

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSilenceSociologyLawPhilosophyPolitical scienceAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The wide variety of literatures in both the countries Canada and India -nurture the growth of a unique identity in each case.Like India's own complex literary heritage, Canadian literature is written in more than one language.It reflects a regionally diverse and multicultural society.Its citizens come from every corner of the globe who retain their own distinctive heritage.Similarly Indian -English literature undeniably is today one of the many modern Indian literatures.The difference between the other Indian literatures and this branch is that other literatures have well-defined communities of readers who speak those languages as their primary languages.The majority of readers of Indian -English literature within India use English as their secondary language.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0430.027
Scholarly communication0.0100.006
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0040.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal on Studies in English Language and LiteratureSame topicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative FictionFrench-language works237,207