Bibliographic record
Abstract
Books reviewed in this section are: Cecilia Widenheim (ed) Utopia and Reality: Swedish Modernism 1900–1960 Alan Wofsy The Picasso Project. Picasso's Paintings, Watercolors, Drawings and Sculptures. A Comprehensive Illustrated Catalogue 1885–1973. The Sixties II 1964–1967 Jodi Cranston The Poetics of Portraiture in the Italian Renaissance John T Freeman Descent to Byworth Elisabeth Kieven and John Pinto Pietro Bracci and Eighteenth‐Century Rome. Drawings for Architecture and Sculpture in the Canadian Centre for Architecture and Other Collections David Wootton Peter Coker RA Colin B Bailey Patriotic Taste. Collecting Modern Art in Pre‐Revolutionary France Gillian Wolfe Look! Zoom in on Art Elizabeth Cowling Picasso Style and Meaning E H Shepard Drawn from Life Arthur R Chandler The Man Who Drew Pooh. The Story of E H Shepard Ed Ruscha Leave any Information at the Signal: Writings, Interviews, Bits, Pages Tom Nichols Tintoretto. Tradition and Identity Susan Dackerman Painted Prints: The Revelation of Colour in Northern Renaissance and Baroque Engravings, Etchings and Woodcuts Jeffrey F Hamburger St John the Divine. The Deified Evangelist in Medieval Art and Theology
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.022 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.658 | 0.675 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".