Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce compte rendu porte sur les séminaires des années académiques 2009‑2010 et 2010‑2011. L’année 2009‑2010 a accordé une large place au thème de la Sainte Face et du visage du Christ dans l’art contemporain au sens large (xixe et xxe siècles) en lien avec un colloque co-organisé par l’équipe « Histara » de l’EPHE et l’équipe « Art des images et art contemporain » de Paris 8 (dir. P.‑L. Rinuy et I. Saint‑Martin). Parmi les autres thèmes abordés, la question du devenir du patrimoine religieux à la croisée entre culte et culture a été l’occasion d’entendre une intervention du Professeur Solange Lefebvre, titulaire de la chaire « Religion, culture et société » de l’université de Montréal (déc. 2009). Les principaux sujets traités en 2010‑2011 ont été liés à un programme international de recherche sur les usages de la figure christique au xxe siècle (dir. Ph. Kaenel et al., université de Lausanne), ainsi qu’à la participation à un projet d’ANR sur la maison Mame à Tours.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".