A Novel Intelligent Two-Way Communication System for Remote Heart Failure Medication Uptitration (the CardioCoach Study): Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Randomized Controlled Trial"?(if not, explain the reason under "other") yes Anders: 1a-i) Identify the mode of delivery in the title Identify the mode of delivery.Preferably use "web-based" and/or "mobile" and/or "electronic game" in the title.Avoid ambiguous terms like "online", "virtual", "interactive".Use "Internet-based" only if Intervention includes non-web-based Internet components (e.g.email), use "computer-based" or "electronic" only if offline products are used.Use "virtual" only in the context of "virtual reality" (3-D worlds).Use "online" only in the context of "online support groups".Complement or substitute product names with broader terms for the class of products (such as "mobile" or "smart phone" instead of "iphone"), especially if the application runs on different platforms.1 2 3 4 5 subitem not at all important essential Does your paper address subitem 1a-i?*Copy and paste relevant sections from manuscript title (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or briefly explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your study A two-way communication system was developed, which was both webbased and mobile.Web-based: "All information gathered via the CardioCoach smartphone application (vital signs, questionnaires, medication intake, etc.) is automatically transmitted to a secured online health management server (i.e.Remecare) without patient input."this server could be consulted by both the technical and clinical call center.Mobile: Patients received a smartphone with remote monitoring sensors. 1a-ii) Non-web-based components or important co-interventions in titleMention non-web-based components or important co-interventions in title, if any (e.g., "with telephone support").1 2 3 4 5subitem not at all important essential Does your paper address subitem 1a-ii?Copy and paste relevant sections from manuscript title (include quotes in quotation marks "like this" to indicate direct quotes from your manuscript), or elaborate on this item by providing additional information not in the ms, or briefly explain why the item is not applicable/relevant for your studyHome nurses informed the patient about the use of the smartphone (application) and remote monitoring sensors.In case of deviating parameters, a phone contact was initiated by the heart failure nurse.In case of technical issues or non-compliance, the technical call center contacted the patient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".