MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236759551 · doi:10.1386/eta.12.2.227_5

Book Reviews

2016· article· en· W4236759551 on OpenAlexaff
Marni Binder, Harold Pearse, Julia Lockheart

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Education through Art · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt Education and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe artsContemplationArtPublishingArt historySociologyHumanitiesPhilosophyTheologyVisual artsLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Arts-Based and Contemplative Practices in Research and Teaching: Honoring Presence, Susan Walsh, Barbara Bickel and Carl Leggo (eds) (2015) New York: Routledge, 190 pp., ISBN: 9780415743877, h/bk, $160USD Art Education in Germany, Georg Peez (ed.) (2015) Munster and New York: Waxmann, 154 pp., ISBN: 9783830932659, p/bk, €24.90 Doctoral Writing in the Creative and Performing Arts, Louise Ravelli, Brian Paltridge and Sue Starfield (eds) (2014) Faringdon: Libri Publishing, 440 pp., ISBN: 9781909818477, p/bk, £21.00

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.412
Threshold uncertainty score0.838

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4120.292

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Education through ArtSame topicArt Education and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207