MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236810626 · doi:10.1017/9781108779340.009

Global Media Ethics

2020· book-chapter· en· W4236810626 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen J. A. Ward

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2020
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunication Studies and Media
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobalizationJournalismMedia ethicsPhenomenonInformation ethicsPolitical scienceEthical codeDigital mediaSociologySocial sciencePublic relationsMedia studiesLawEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Global media ethics is the study and application of the norms that should guide the responsible use of informational, public media that is now global in content, reach, and impact. Global media ethics is not the empirical study of globalization as a complex phenomenon affecting culture, economics, and communication. It is the analysis of the ethical impact of globalization on news media, whose original codes of ethics were codified about a century ago when journalism was non-digital and non-global.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.010
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicCommunication Studies and MediaFrench-language works237,207