Some Fundamental Characteristics of the One-Dimensional Alternate-Direction-Implicit Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Some fundamental characteristics are investigated for the alternate-direction-implicit finite-difference time-domain (ADI-FDTD) method in the one-dimensional case, such as growth and dissipation, numerical dispersion, and a time-step size limit. It is shown that this two sub-step method alternates dissipation and growth that exactly compensate and, thus, is unconditionally stable. The numerical dispersion error is larger than for Yee's method and there is an "intrinsic temporal numerical dispersion" accuracy limit at zero mesh size, which is the highest accuracy one can obtain with a meaningful time-step size. Also, it is shown that, for some combinations of time step and mesh size, the ADI-FDTD method does not propagate a wave. There is a minimum numerical velocity limited by the mesh density, and the wave attenuates for time-step sizes larger than an "ADI limit." Thus, the time-step size does have an upper bound, which is smaller than the Nyquist limit. The results of numerical experiments are shown to agree well with the theoretical prediction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it