MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A PROPOSAL FOR A NEW RED ALGAL ORDER, THE THOREALES

2000· article· en· W4236887491 on OpenAlexaff
Robert G. Sheath, Kirsten M. Müller, Alison R. Sherwood

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Phycology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyPhylogenetic treeThallusTaxon18S ribosomal RNACladeBotanyEvolutionary biologyPhylogeneticsGeneZoologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The freshwater red algal genera Nemalionopsis and Thorea are currently classified in the family Thoreaceae of the Batrachospermales. However, these two genera differ from other members of the order in having multiaxial thalli. The phylogenetic relationships of the genera were investigated using a combination of DNA sequence analysis ( rbcL and 18S rRNA genes) and transmission electron microscopy. In both gene trees, Nemalionopsis and Thorea form well supported clades (87–100% bootstrap values) separate from other members of the Batrachospermales as well as taxa from the Acrochaetiales, Palmariales, and Nemaliales. In addition, analysis of the secondary structure of the 18S rRNA gene in Nemalionopsis and Thorea reveals an additional helix, which is not present in any of the other taxa within the Rhodophyta. Pit plugs of the Thoreaceae also differ from those of other members of the Batrachospermales in not having an outer cap layer that is not universally domed. Based on these findings, it is proposed that Nemalionopsis and Thorea represent a distinct taxonomic group that should be recognized as a new order, the Thoreales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of PhycologySame topicMarine and coastal plant biologyFrench-language works237,207