MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236901077 · doi:10.5430/rwe.v11n6p25

Determinants of Marketing Performance on Durian Product for Exporting: Study in South of Thailand

2020· article· en· W4236901077 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Waleerak Sittisom, Paristha Thanomvech, Witthaya Mekhum, Napasri Suwanajote

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch in World Economy · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Trade and Competitiveness
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessDistribution (mathematics)MediationProduct (mathematics)MarketingPromotion (chess)Export performanceExport marketingAdvertisingIndustrial organizationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thailand is the major exporter of durian products worldwide. Durian is the most important fruit and it’s called the king of fruits in Thailand. The economy of Thailand majorly bases on the exporting of durian to other related countries. The major objective of this study to find out the determinants of marketing performance that affect the durian product exporting in the south of Thailand. Respondents of this study are employees working in exporting companies working in the south of Thailand. Data is collected through a drop-down survey method and a questionnaire is used. After it, Smart PLS used for analysis. Results revealed that determinants of marketing performance like (Product capability, Promotion, and Distribution capability) have a positive, significant impact on exporting of durian. Two mediators including attitude towards exporting have a positive effect but the second motivation to export has no effect on durian export. Attitude towards exporting mediates the relationship between distribution capability and exporting of durian. Motivation to export has no mediation between promotion capability and export of durian. The study recommends to exporters that for increasing export to other countries they should focus on marketing performance determinants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch in World EconomySame topicGlobal Trade and CompetitivenessFrench-language works237,207