MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236955260 · doi:10.17758/eares10.eap1120245

Thermosensitive Hollowed Magnetic Lignin Nanocarrier Laden with Doxorubicin for Responsive Delivery and Hyperthermia Treatment of Cancer

2020· article· en· W4236955260 on OpenAlexafffund
F.B. Waanders, Elvis Fosso‐Kankeu, Martin Mkandawire

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsCape Breton University
FundersNorth-West UniversityCape Breton University
KeywordsNanocarriersDoxorubicinHyperthermiaMagnetic hyperthermiaLigninCancer treatmentCancerDrug deliveryMagnetic nanoparticlesMaterials scienceChemistryCancer researchNanotechnologyMedicineChemotherapyNanoparticleSurgeryInternal medicineOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To improve effectiveness while using very low doses to avoid side effects on one hand and maintain affordability, we are proposing a therapeutic system that can target cancerous cells with more precision and deliver the drug upon induction by the doctor.The concept is to use magnetised polymer-based nanocapsules of cancer drugs, which can be magnetically direct to the targets and respond to magnetic stimulus and hyperthermia as well as magnify the drug potency.Hence, we have developed: (a) an affordable self-assembly method of synthesizing lignin hollowed nanoparticles with high loading capacity for the encapsulation of doxorubicin drug molecules; and (b) a method of magnetising the lignin polymer and surface functionalised on the nanocapsule with a thermosensitive agent.Upon exposure to an external magnetic field, the cancer cells will be selectively targeted, and the generation of heat will induce the release of the drug molecules from the capsule and amplify the potency of doxorubicin drug that even low doses become effective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryFrench-language works237,207