MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4236982768 · doi:10.1002/fld.2522

Erratum: Numerical modeling of sloshing motion in a tuned liquid damper outfitted with a submerged slat screen

2011· erratum· en· W4236982768 on OpenAlexaff
Morteza Maravani, M. Hamed

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids · 2011
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpellingSlosh dynamicsComputer scienceDamperMotion (physics)Computer graphics (images)MechanicsSimulationAlgorithmPhysicsArtificial intelligenceEngineeringStructural engineeringPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 2010 (DOI: 10.1002/fld.2216) This paper was published online on 12 January 2010. Subsequent to online publication the authors wish to make the following correction: The error on the spelling of Morteza's surname ‘Maravani’ in the author by line would be corrected to ‘Marivani’. It will now read as: Morteza Marivani and M. S. Hamed

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.246
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in FluidsSame topicFluid Dynamics Simulations and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207