Historical Archives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Curth is a relatively unknown giant of dermatology.This eminent pioneer, who could have easily been lost to the persecution of Nazi Germany, does not even have a Wikipedia page!We describe her numerous achievements and contributions to dermatology.She was born in Breslau, Germany (now Wrocław, Poland), one of four children to Jewish parents.Helen's childhood was traumatic.Her father died before she reached her teenage years and a brother died after drinking a bottle of lye as a child.She later lost her sister during the First World War.Having survived this, Helen graduated from medical school in 1923.She worked with Josef Jadassohn in Breslau investigating the sensitivity of syphilitic skin lesions to a dull probe.The extreme sensitivity of papular lesions of secondary syphilis to touch was later known as the Ollendorff probe sign.This clinical feature is still used as an aid to diagnosing secondary syphilis.She received honours for this thesis at the beginning of what became a brilliant academic career.In 1924 she moved to Berlin under the guidance of Professor Abraham Buschke.They described Buschke-Ollendorff syndrome (in 1928), a rare hereditary disorder of connective tissue.She met her husband Wilhelm Curth during this period.In 1931 the Curths' lives changed.Returning from work by streetcar, Wilhelm witnessed a group of uniformed men board and remove anyone of Jewish appearance.The risk to his wife and child was overwhelming and he suggested that the family leave Germany.Unfortunately, Buschke was later arrested and died in a Nazi concentration camp.The Curths moved to New York, anglicized their names and began academic careers with Columbia University.Helen Curth's main areas of interest were acanthosis nigricans (AN) and disorders of keratinization.She published seminal papers on AN in peer-reviewed journals and contributed to Fitzpatrick's Dermatology in General Medicine.She formed criteria to diagnose paraneoplastic AN; to this day, they are called Curth's criteria.In 1954, with Madge Macklin, she reported a family affected by ichthyosis hystrix, which became known as Curth-Macklin ichthyosis.This made her the first woman to have eponymous syndromes in her maiden and married names.Curth-Macklin syndrome was the first named after two female physicians.Helen worked into her 70s.Tragically, she developed Alzheimer's dementia, and on her death in 1982 she donated her brain for research.She should be an inspiration to all dermatologists, present and future. Posters H05
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.418 | 0.226 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".