P-097 A Multicenter Open-Label Study Assessing Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Safety of Subcutaneous Golimumab in Pediatric Subjects with Moderately-Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) who fail 5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, and immunomodulators have limited alternative approved treatment options. Golimumab is a subcutaneous (SC) anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agent that has the potential to offer such patients a safe, effective, and convenient treatment option. This is a multicenter open-label study with a pharmacokinetic (PK) portion (week 0-14) and a study extension (weeks 14–126); we report here results through week 14. Subjects aged 2 to 17 years with moderate-to-severe UC (Mayo score 6–12, endoscopy subscore ≥2) who failed previous therapy as noted above and were naive to anti-TNF treatment were enrolled. Subjects received SC golimumab induction at week 0/2 by weight (<45 kg [90/45 mg/m2]; ≥45 kg [200/100 mg]). At week 6, Mayo clinical responders continued golimumab maintenance q4w (<45 kg [45 mg/m2]; ≥45 kg [100 mg]). Key outcome measures included PK and immunogenicity (serum golimumab concentrations, PK parameters, antibodies to golimumab), efficacy (Mayo score, Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI) score), and safety (adverse events [AEs], serious AEs, AEs leading to discontinuation). Thirty-five subjects enrolled and received ≥1 dose of golimumab. At baseline, the mean ± SD age, weight, and duration of disease were 13.4 ± 3.2 years (Range 6–17), 51.7 ± 22.7 kg (Range 19.7–134.0) and 2.4 ± 3.1 years (Range 0.2–16.0), respectively. Subjects had moderate-to-severe disease activity (mean ± SD: Mayo score 8.1 ± 1.8 [Range 6–12], PUCAI score 48 ± 17 [Range 15–80], CRP level 10.1 ± 23.9 mg/L [Range 0.1–116.0]). Most (71.4%) had extensive colonic involvement and 85.7% received ≥1 concomitant UC medications at baseline: corticosteroids including budesonide (37.1%), immunomodulators (57.1%), and 5-ASAs (65.7%). At weeks 2, 4, and 6, mean serum golimumab concentrations were 6.5, 6.5, and 2.6 μg/mL, respectively, which were similar to those observed in adults who received 200/100 mg induction. At week 6, 60% and 42.9% of subjects achieved clinical response (Mayo score decrease ≥30% and ≥3 points, rectal bleeding subscore decrease ≥1 or absolute subscore ≤1) and clinical remission (Mayo score ≤2, no individual subscore >1), respectively, and 34.3% achieved PUCAI remission (PUCAI <10). Mucosal healing as evaluated by sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy at week 6 (Mayo endoscopy subscore ≤1) was achieved in 54.3% of subjects and 22.9% achieved complete healing (Mayo endoscopic subscore 0). Parallel substantial reductions in objective biomarkers of inflammation (CRP, calprotectin, lactoferrin) were observed from baseline to week 6. Among Week 6 Mayo clinical responders who received q4w golimumab maintenance, 57.1% were in PUCAI remission at week 14. Through week 14, 94.3% of subjects reported ≥1 AE and 8.6% had an AE leading to discontinuation. Infections were reported in 37.1% of subjects, none were serious. Injection site reactions were reported in 17.1% of subjects, all were mild. Three subjects were positive for antibodies to golimumab. Eleven subjects (31.4%) reported 13 SAEs, including UC flare (n = 10) and one event each of abdominal pain, iron deficiency anemia, and acute pancreatitis. No opportunistic infections, malignancies or deaths were reported. Golimumab was generally well tolerated in this small open-label study of pediatric subjects with UC. The PK, efficacy, and safety outcomes observed were comparable with those previously reported in the golimumab adult UC phase 3 trials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".