MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237046288 · doi:10.3410/f.1166522.627517

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Effects of cigarette smoke on fertilization and embryo development in vivo.

2009· dataset· en· W4237046288 on OpenAlexaff
Lauren Foster

Bibliographic record

VenueFaculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · 2009
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmbryoAndrologyEmbryogenesisBlastocystHuman fertilizationSmokeTelomereApoptosisEmbryonic stem cellBiologyChemistryMedicineAnatomyCell biologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of smoking on eggs and subsequent embryo development by maternal exposure to cigarette smoke.DESIGN: Mice were exposed to cigarette smoke or cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) for 4 weeks and then examined for development and telomere function of embryos in vitro after fertilization. In addition, the effects of continuous smoke on embryo development and telomere length were determined by treating mice for 4 weeks, followed by continuous exposure to cigarette smoke or CSC after fertilization.SETTING: Laboratory study.ANIMAL(S): CD1 mice.INTERVENTION(S): Mice were exposed to cigarette smoke or CSC.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The percentage (rate) of blastocyst development, quality of embryos assessed by total cell number, apoptosis, Oct4 expression (a molecular marker of embryonic stem cells), telomere length and loss, and chromosomal instability were compared between smoke- and CSC- treated mice and sham-treated mice.RESULT(S): Mice exposed to cigarette smoke or CSC for 4 weeks exhibited increased egg fragmentation or delayed fertilization, thus reducing development to blastocysts in vitro. Fragmented eggs showed increased reactive oxygen species. Mice exposed to smoke or CSC showed increased apoptosis and altered expression of Oct4 in developed embryos. The effects of smoke or CSC on embryo development showed a dose-dependent relationship to exposure time. Exposure to smoke or CSC beginning 4 weeks before fertilization altered expression of Oct4 and increased apoptosis in blastocysts. Notably, the rate of abnormal embryos significantly increased in the smoke and CSC groups. Smoke and CSC shortened telomeres in embryos, but their telomere shortening was not enough to induce major chromosome abnormalities in mice, which have unusually long telomeres.CONCLUSION(S): Together, the whole animal exposure model shows that cigarette smoke induces oxidative stress, telomere shortening, and apoptosis, and compromises embryo development in vivo. PMID: 19019360

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.270
Threshold uncertainty score0.904

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2700.121

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFaculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical LiteratureSame topicBirth, Development, and HealthFrench-language works237,207