MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237056280 · doi:10.1515/cppm

Chemical Product and Process Modeling

2013· paratext· en· W4237056280 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Product and Process Modeling · 2013
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMineral Processing and Grinding
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)PID controllerMultivariable calculusApproximation errorLinearizationArtificial neural networkMATLABNonlinear systemComputer scienceBall millMean squared errorAutoregressive modelControl engineeringMean absolute percentage errorMathematicsEngineeringAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceControl (management)StatisticsTemperature control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective Chemical Product and Process Modeling (CPPM) is a quarterly journal that publishes theoretical and applied research on product and process design modeling, simulation and optimization. Thanks to its international editorial board, the journal assembles the best papers from around the world on to cover the gap between product and process. The journal brings together chemical and process engineering researchers, practitioners, and software developers in a new forum for the international modeling and simulation community. Editors represent top engineering institutions across the globe, such as the University of Tehran, the Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, Rutgers, Indian Institute of Technology, the Technical University Hamburg, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Dalhouse University, University Politehnica of Bucharest, University College London, Auburn University, Universidade do Minho, National University of Singapore, University of Paderborn, University of Lapeenranta, University of Pannonia, The City College of New York, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Texas A&M University at Qatar, Texas A&M University at Qatar, Politecnico of Milano, University of Wollongong, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, CANMET Energy Technology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Ecole Nationale Supérieure en Génie des Technologies Industrielles, ENSGTI, University of Western Ontario, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki and Centre for Research and Technology, IFP Energies nouvelles, University of Calgary, Abo Akademi University, Technical University Hamburg, University of Auckland, UCLA School of Public Health and the University of Buenos Aires. Topics equation oriented and modular simulation optimization technology for process and materials design, new modeling techniques shortcut modeling and design approaches performance of commercial and in-house simulation and optimization tools challenges faced in industrial product and process simulation and optimization computational fluid dynamics environmental process, food and pharmaceutical modeling topics drawn from the substantial areas of overlap between modeling and mathematics applied to chemical products and processes Article formats Editorial Notes, Research Articles, Reviews > Information on submission process Submit Article

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it