MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237121606 · doi:10.31235/osf.io/yk5rb

Tratar-mentes:Tratamientos psicológicos alternativos

2019· preprint· en· W4237121606 on OpenAlexaff
Matías Luciano Araya

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychological Treatments and Disorders
Canadian institutionsCytodiagnostics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychotherapistPsychologyTheme (computing)PsychiatryAlternative medicineMedicineClinical psychologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The research seeks to know the experiences and perspectives of twenty-eight people who suffer from some type of emotional disorder, about psychotherapy, alternative therapies, the use of psychotropic and alternative medicine, and the symptoms that led to their diagnosis or self-diagnosis. A qualitative survey was carried out, disseminated from different social networks in groups related to the theme. The results show a good experience with psychotherapy, alternative treatments, and alternative medicine as an adjunct to treatment. While it highlights a high number of testimonies against the effectiveness of psychotropic drugs and their side effects. In addition, there is a high rate of self-diagnosis in the people surveyed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPsychological Treatments and DisordersFrench-language works237,207