Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Up until 411, Augustine was involved in the controversy with the Donatists. Immediately after his conversion, Augustine believed that there were only two philosophical questions, one concerning the soul and the other concerning God. The first problem regarding the soul Augustine faced after his conversion was that of immortality. In De libero arbitrio, Augustine admits four hypotheses regarding the souls of the descendants: they derive from Adam's soul; they are created in time for every single man who is born; they pre-exist in God, who sends them to vivify the bodies of individuals; and they pre-exist 'somewhere else' and come into bodies spontaneously. Augustine's philosophia rationalis begins with a refutation of Academic Scepticism. The starting point of Augustine's ethics is an axiom taken from Cicero's Hortensius. Augustine carried out the task assigned to 'true philosophy' at Cassiciacum systematically in De Trinitate many years later. Augustine devoted three of the four books De doctrina christiana expressly to biblical hermeneutics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it