MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237170104 · doi:10.1109/wsc.2012.6465107

Evaluating healthcare systems with insufficient capacity to meet demand

2012· article· en· W4237170104 on OpenAlex
Sachin R. Pendharkar, Diane P. Bischak, Paul Rogers

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings Title: Proceedings of the 2012 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersRockwell Automation
KeywordsBottleneckFlexibility (engineering)QueueComputer scienceHealth careDiscrete event simulationQueueing theoryIdentification (biology)Operations researchWork (physics)Healthcare systemRisk analysis (engineering)SimulationEngineeringStatisticsMathematicsComputer networkBusinessEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modeling healthcare systems using discrete-event simulation (DES) provides the flexibility to analyze both their steady-state and transient performance. However, there has been little work on how best to measure healthcare system performance in cases where there is at least one unstable and lengthening queue in the system, so that traditional steady-state measures such as mean queue length or mean time in queue are meaningless. Using the example of an academic sleep disorders clinic, the authors discuss some of the challenges in constructing a DES model of a healthcare system that has a growing waiting list due to insufficient capacity in one or more areas. Specific considerations include: bottleneck identification through pre-analysis, how to determine a meaningful warm-up period, and the selection of performance measures given system instability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.828
Threshold uncertainty score0.545

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.198
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it