Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sentiment analysis refers to a broad range of fields of natural language processing, computational linguistics and text mining. Sentiment classification of reviews and comments has emerged as the most useful application in the area of sentiment analysis. Although sentiment classification generally is carried out at the document level, accurate results require analysis at the sentence level. Bag of words and feature based sentiment are the most popular approaches used by researchers to deal with sentiment classification of opinions about products such as movies, electronics, cars etc. Until recently most classification techniques have considered adjectives, adverbs and nouns as features. This paper proposes a new approach based on verb as an important opinion term particularly in social domains. We extract opinion structures which consider verb as the core element. Sentiment orientation is recognized from sentiments inside of opinion structures and their association with the social issue. Experimental results show that considering verbs improves the performance of sentiment classification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it