MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237248152 · doi:10.1109/joe.2013.2251985

Erratum to “Challenges, Benefits, and Opportunities in Installing and Operating Cabled Ocean Observatories: Perspectives from NEPTUNE Canada” [C. R. Barnes, M. M. R. Best , F. R. Johnson, L. Pautet, and B. Pirenne, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 144–157, Jan. 2013]

2013· erratum· en· W4237248152 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering · 2013
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEnvironmental Monitoring and Data Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeptuneInstallationEngineeringOceanographyRemote sensingAeronauticsTelecommunicationsGeologyPhysicsMechanical engineeringAstronomyPlanet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the authors' biographies section of [1], the location of Laurentian University was incorrect. Instead of Ottawa, the location should be Sudbury. In addition, Lucie Pautet was incorrectly listed as being Associate Director for NEPTUNE Canada, Victoria, BC, Canada, from 2009 to 2011. The dates should be from 2010 to 2012.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.047
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.636
Threshold uncertainty score0.733

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.047
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0110.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0570.038

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Oceanic EngineeringSame topicEnvironmental Monitoring and Data ManagementFrench-language works237,207