Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This author attempted to understand the potential impact of using closed-circuit TV as an educational strategy to meet the learning needs of patients and their families. To do so, she gathered data from two hospitals that offered this avenue for health teaching. Of the 70 patients who participated in the research study, 32 were maternity patients and 38 surgical patients. The data were measured using the MAQSI criteria, which the Ordre des infirmières et infirmiers du Québec uses to measure quality of nursing care. The results revealed that although TV has many practical educational applications, TV in itself did not have a significant impact on learning. The hospital with the most significant learning had integrated closed-circuit TV education into the nursing care plan. The author also found that many factors could influence the impact that educational programming had on patients. Examples include the time selected for viewing or the length of stay in hospital. However, the key to the successful use of TV as an educational tool in the hospital setting seems to lie in the integration of TV learning with other conventional teaching methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it