Bibliographic record
Abstract
No AccessJournal of UrologyLetters to the Editor1 Oct 2000RE: ANDROPAUSE: A MISNOMER FOR A TRUE CLINICAL ENTITY Rosemary Basson Rosemary BassonRosemary Basson More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67178-9AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "RE: ANDROPAUSE: A MISNOMER FOR A TRUE CLINICAL ENTITY." The Journal of Urology, 164(4), p. 1319 References 1 : Secondary hypogonadism in older men: its relation to impotence. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol1990; 71: 963. Google Scholar Departments of Psychiatry, and Obstetrics and GynecologyVancouver Hospital and Health Sciences CenterEchelon Building855 West 12th AveVancouver, British Columbia, Canada V5Z 1M9© 2000 by American Urological Association, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 164 Issue 4 October 2000 Page: 1319 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2000 by American Urological Association, Inc.Metrics Author Information Rosemary Basson More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".