MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237383076 · doi:10.1086/ahr/106.2.540

<scp>Mira Wilkins</scp> and <scp>Harm Schröter</scp>, editors. <i>The Free-Standing Company in the World Economy 1830–1996</i>. New York: Oxford University Press. 1998. Pp. xxi, 480. $95.00

2001· article· en· W4237383076 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Historical Review · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal Financial Crisis and Policies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmEconomic historyPolitical scienceHistoryLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article Mira Wilkins and Harm Schröter, editors. The Free-Standing Company in the World Economy 1830–1996. New York: Oxford University Press. 1998. Pp. xxi, 480. $95.00 Get access Wilkins Mira and Schröter Harm, editors. The Free-Standing Company in the World Economy 1830–1996. New York: Oxford University Press. 1998. Pp. xxi, 480. $95.00. Christopher Armstrong Christopher Armstrong York University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The American Historical Review, Volume 106, Issue 2, April 2001, Pages 540–541, https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/106.2.540 Published: 01 April 2001

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.165
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Historical ReviewSame topicGlobal Financial Crisis and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207