C-REACTIVE PROTEIN AND PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE IN ELDERLY POPULATIONS: RESULTS FROM THE IMIAS STUDY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
given a letter).Analysis: The largest Lyapunov exponent (Lye) and approximate entropy (ApEn) were calculated to quantify the temporal structure of variability in ankle, knee, and hip joint angles.A mixed ANOVA was used to determine the interaction between groups and within subjects.Results: Structure of variability was significantly different between groups (Lye: ankle(p<.001),knee(p=.004),and hip(p<.001);ApEn: ankle(p<.001),knee(p=.005))with higher mean values in all instances in the older group.Only the young showed significant differences between conditions (Control to PF(p=.028) at ankle, WR to PF(p=.002) at ankle, knee(p=.009)and hip(p=.045)).Conclusions: Aging impacts the control of movements with older adults showing more randomness and greater divergence rates in their joint angle trajectories.Interestingly, older adults made no significant adjustments while dual-tasking which could indicate less adaptability in walking, especially during secondary tasks C-REACTIVE PROTEIN
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".