Innovation, creativity and governance: Social dynamics of economic performance in city-regions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The pressure towards a globalizing, knowledge-based economy raises questions about the underlying determinants of economic performance in city regions. The creation and diffusion of new knowledge drives innovation in knowledge-intensive production and service activities, which in turn, drives economic performance and growth. Although these processes are strongly shaped by national institutions and global knowledge flows, recent analyses of innovation and creativity emphasize the continuing relevance of regions in general and urban regions in particular as critical sites for determining economic performance. This work also suggests that the underlying social dynamics of urban regions are particularly significant in shaping economic outcomes. This paper explores some recent evidence on the social nature of innovation dynamics in urban regions, the increasing significance of talent and creativity in urban economies and their implications for the economic performance of city regions. It concludes with a discussion of the need for the strategic management of urban economies to cope with the challenges they face.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it