PERCEIVED SPOUSAL SUPPORT BUFFERS ASSOCIATION BETWEEN DAILY AFFECTIVE REACTIVITY AND HEMOGLOBIN A1C
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Affective reactivity to daily stressors has been linked with poor health outcomes (Piazza, Charles, Sliwinski, Mogle, & Almeida, 2013). Spousal support may represent a protective factor for reactive individuals, particularly in older age when spouses increasingly turn to each other for support. This study uses 21 simultaneous momentary assessments from both partners in 120 older couples (M age = 71 years; M relationship duration = 41 years) and links stressor-negative affect associations with glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C), a biomarker of diabetes risk. In line with previous research, initial findings suggest that responding to a social stressor with high negative affect is associated with higher HbA1C. Importantly, this association is moderated by perceived spousal support. Thus, greater perceptions of spousal support may be protective for glycemic control of highly reactive individuals. Taken together, spousal support may represent a resource for attenuating declining glycemic control in older adulthood.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it