MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4237489434 · doi:10.1063/1.1150634

Lock-in common-mode rejection demodulation: Measurement technique and applications to thermal-wave detection. Experimental

2000· article· en· W4237489434 on OpenAlexafffund
S. Paoloni, Lena Nicolaides, Andreas Mandelis

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Scientific Instruments · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDemodulationDuty cycleLock-in amplifierOpticsDynamic rangeAmplifierSquare waveMaterials scienceAcousticsSIGNAL (programming language)Wide dynamic rangeThermalOptoelectronicsPhysicsComputer scienceTelecommunicationsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new signal generation methodology based on lock-in amplifier common mode rejection demodulation for materials nondestructive evaluation has been implemented experimentally with thermal waves in a photothermal radiometric apparatus. A procedure to calibrate the experiment is described in order to take into account instrumental time delay phase shifts between the reference and the optical excitation wave form. Some preliminary results obtained on Zr–2.5Nb shot peened samples are presented and compared to those obtained by temporally modulating the pump intensity as a 50% duty cycle square wave. The comparison shows the new measurement methodology to be a very promising technique for nondestructive evaluation and depth profiling applications, featuring high detectivity for low-dynamic-range and poor-signal to noise ratio signals, such as those obtained with thermal-wave diagnostics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReview of Scientific InstrumentsSame topicThermography and Photoacoustic TechniquesFrench-language works237,207